Thursday, May 14, 2009

Ubuntu 9.04 -Really the Linux for human Beings.

.

Does jaunty jackalope has what it takes to satisfy hungry users, who want style and others who want substance? Fortunately, they at canonical have a well thought about solution for 9.04 this time around. It’s not about new things but about speed and stability. They have focused on stability and little bit of bling. Quite a few apparent changes are there, though they claim changes to be over a thousand. The new Jaunty jackalope has very little system wide changes since Intrepid Ibex (8.10). So is the new ubuntu worth six months' work of the canonical team or they've just taken the term off for a little rest, we are going to find out.

 

Last summer, Mark Shuttleworth - the founder of the Ubuntu project and the chief executive officer of Canonical, stated or challenged to make a desktop rival for OSx on or before 2010. When asked about his strategies. He was quoted saying this.

 

"Notifications were very carefully chosen as a starting point. We wanted something which affects multiple applications. . . . We also wanted something that would be slightly controversial. We wanted to make some tough choices, like removing actions from notifications, and we knew that would trigger discussion and debate about the design process. . .it is small enough that we believed we could do it in a single cycle, but meaningful enough and visible enough that it would draw attention to the work that we're doing."

 

They did dig up their noses and accomplish that, in fact it produced so much controversy that they had to make that notification system optional and in course of time only for certain distros. Though later they were diplomatically included as Jaunty was released with an indicator applet. The controversy made them to make a modification such as a gnome-stracciatella-session, which allows users to press F10 when they log in and get a GNOME desktop with standard notifications. In addition, an alpha release of Jaunty included a configuration tool for notifications, but was omitted from the official release. However, Jaunty does include an Indicator applet for the panel that signals that something on the desktop requires your attention.

That being said the main focus of improvement of jaunty had been speed, stability and notifications.

 

I definitely wanted the new and improved ubuntu to a test ride and perhaps to replace intrepid. First off i did the recommended upgrade through synaptic. It took a while to download and install, after I did that, the changes weren't visible at all. Since the changes itself are very minimalistic moreover my previous settings were retained, i saw nothing new. Even the usplash was left unchanged however it was upgraded to the smaller version and was displayed during shutting-down process alone. Then I found somewhere that someone was bragging about mandriva 2009 spring to be one of the best. I wanted to try it hence i made a clean install of mandriva and did the testing and tried Xubuntu next and then Open GEU. I then made a clean install of ubuntu jaunty to observe the changes and simply to prove that whatever I try, i end up with ubuntu, meaning - Jaunty has no rival at-least until the next release.

 

The install procedure as usual was the simplest thing in the whole world; it took as much as 30 minutes. It provides with quite a few options and assumes the rest. And believe me, the 'rest' would be hassle at this point for new users.

 

After installing I found the new notifications to be as good as their bragging. The volume controls have gone horizontal, which is a good thing because the older vertical bar reduced the volume as soon as you clicked it. Horizontally it doesn't do that anymore. It’s quite hassle free. The mixer applet is very good and elaborate. The notifications are neat and eye-candy and yeah, Informational.

 


As usual nautilus is rocking, cool, efficient and faster too. Considering the features of nautilus, I daresay, it’s the most efficient file manager. It has previews even for audio files, yeah, surprisingly enough it works like a charm too. You point at an audio file and it starts playing the file. The interface is also one of the very intuitive methods around, the tabs and history boxes above are, according to me - 'God-sent'.


I went to places and my NTFS drives were listed there, I clicked on them and they were opened in nautilus, just like that, with R/w capability. Well if you're a windows user. You’ll say "So what? I can do this XP, what the heck, i can do this since Windows 95" but if you are a Linux user especially from XFCE and KDE environments you'll find this pretty handy.

 

Comparing with Xubuntu, OpenGEU, Mandriva and Kubuntu, Ubuntu is light years ahead and it’s here to rule. Ubuntu is far superior in terms of functionality as far as I'm concerned. For a newbie or a regular user or a power user, Ubuntu makes it easier and efficient. I can be 100% sure that they have been keeping their word when they say Linux for Human beings.

 

Many claim Ubuntu is not as fast and light as XFCE or Flashy and eye-candy as KDE distros but all that can be done. Flashy things can be done using compiz and as far as the lightness and spend, it doesn't get faster than this. The gap between Ubuntu and Xubuntu is a hair line and can only be realized by a semi-decade old PC. PCs that we use can hardly feel the difference. Given the advantages and stability one should obviously go for Ubuntu. It should hardly matter to an individual but for larger deployments, companies and thin clients Xubuntu will make a difference and their work will not go unappreciated there.

 

 

My Ratings:

 

v Speed:                   5/5;

v Stability:             5/5;

v Looks:                   4/5; (looks pretty much the same as gnome)

v Features:             5/5;

v Usability:           5/5;

v Overall:              4.8/5;

 

It doesn't get better than this or at least till October.

 

Screenshots:








Wednesday, May 13, 2009

XUBUNTU 9.04 = XFCE ultimatum.


I have to say that the title of this post is easily justified by the new XFCE 4.6.1 based xubuntu 9.04.

It does what it is meant to do. Its fast, light, clean and efficient.

 

 

"Minimum system requirements:

You need 192 MB RAM to run the Live CD or 128 MB RAM to install. The Alternate Install CD only requires you to have 64 MB RAM at install time. To install Xubuntu, you need 1.5 GB of free space on your hard disk. Once installed, Xubuntu can run with starting from 192 (or even just 128) MB RAM, but it is strongly recommended to have at least 256 MB RAM."

 

From the above quote from the Xubuntu website, we can see the lightness of Xubuntu desktop. I decided to look into it. I tried the live cd and it itself is fast. Impressed by the speed I went on to installing it. I tried some modifications by installing compiz and it was a blast. The transparency, the wobbly windows and other animations were simply marvelous. It started to look like KDE. Thunar is fast and stable; the thumbnail generation is speedy and efficient. There were also some glitches in installing compiz so I recommend to go with normal settings for the intended lightness.

 

Major gripe with Xubuntu is that you have to manually mount NTFS drives and place shortcuts for them. After mounting they don't appear in places, we have to place a shortcut for the mount folder ourselves and include it in placesThis was really idiotic. They include native support for NTFS drives and they don't include auto mount option or even a GUI mounting option. This was the case in Mandriva too. There the normal mounting makes the drives read-only drives. I entered auto mount option in fstab and made it to mount at boot. But that didn't work either. I had to type in the terminal and mount as root. Other than this there are no other minuses in Xubuntu and it works as a breeze.

 

The new login window, bootsplash and themes are a treat to the eye and surprising. For a light environment they include nice logins. Overall this is a very fast variant of Ubuntu for running in thin clients and low resource and a decade old PCs. Others can just go to Ubuntu and cut the hassle.

 

My Rating:

 

v Speed :              5/5;

v Stability :       5/5;

v Looks:                5/5;

v Features:         4/5; (open office would have been better)

v Usability:       3/5; (Manual mounting Sucks)

v overall:            4.4/5; (Really good)

 

 

Screenshots:

(I borrowed some)














Open-GEU 8.10 - Enlightment of ubuntu Intrpid Ibex

Open-GEU 8.10 - Enlightenment of Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex ????

 

I tried this distro after reading the release notes and I thought this was a shiny edition of Ubuntu, since I’m a fan of ubuntu since gusty, I wanted to try this.

First I wanted to test it live. It took an astounding 25mins to boot, compared with ubuntu these times are years. The Screen that I first saw erased all the bad feelings I had of waiting. It looked absolutely stunning and bright. Those who like sober themes have to change them as soon as possible. It has a dock at the bottom as in OSX. The glassy panels, window themes and wallpaper are eye-candy.

Under the hood there are many flaws that i switched to Xubuntu in an hour of using this. I tried to mount the NTFS partitions in my system, but some magical force kept me from doing that, finally I too gave up.

Thunar works as it should, nothing new. There is some unknown file manager which shoots up when I double click a folder. This mystical thing looks plain and stupid and does stupider things. When I click a folder inside this window it opens in another new window. So I learned that I should launch Thunar from the dock and then browse the files and not from the places menu.

I became tired of this; I thought installing would at least speed things up and resolve certain issues. Again, I was wrong. The installation itself took ample time, and it was simple enough and similar to ubuntu. All the above gripes remained even after the installation. I enabled local admin login and logged in as root. There was yet another surprise for me. It was asking choices for first time run. I didn’t understand many and just went through it.

Everything was different in root login; the wallpaper, theme, dock style and contents of the dock.

The mounted partitions had rw capability but only with the strange file  manager not with Thunar. Then I gave up completely and shut down the system. It was time to move on to Xubuntu and perhaps some peace of mind.

 

My ratings:

 

v Speed :              5/5;

v stability:          4/5;

v Looks:                5/5;

v Features:         2/5; (not even the default games were there, no openoffice.org)

v Usability :      2/5; (that’s a joke)

v Overall:          3.6 / 5;

 

Screenshots:

(I didn't have the energy to check out the screenshot feature. so I borrowed some)







Disclaimer: This is the result of personal experience and it can change from person to person, I donot write this in the intention of hurting anybody. I'm just venting out.




Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Kubuntu 9.04 - Shiny but not polished and has nothing surprising





Kubuntu 9.04 was supposedly the best looking and earliest KD based distro to be released with the latest and most beautiful KDE 4.2. Kubuntu looks exactly like the KDE 4.2 . No customizations except the loading splash and wall paper. It still has the networking bug which doesn't allow wireless networking. Well it’s not much of a problem to wired users. But it’s a deliberate bug.

The updates and packages installed using adept is still a dream. It just won't download those reps and install them. And Konquerer looks good but is not as functional as nautilus.